The Inevitable Horizon: Why Deering Park Was Always Coming...

EDGEWATER, Fla. If you drive west on State Road 442, the smoke and heavy machinery at the tree line tell a story that goes beyond simple construction. It is the visual signal that the secret of Southeast Volusia is officially out.

For decades, Edgewater, New Smyrna Beach, and Oak Hill have existed in a unique pocket of Florida. We are rich in land, blessed with Intracoastal access, and have remained relatively untouched compared to our neighbors to the south. But in a state that runs on development, geography is destiny. When you hold the resources we hold, growth is not just a possibility. It is an inevitability.

The clearing at Deering Park is not an anomaly. It is the natural consequence of being the last affordable frontier on the coast.

The End of the Bedroom Community

The sheer scale of Deering Park, 5,000 acres in Edgewater alone, with a regional footprint of 70,000 acres, signals the end of the "bedroom community" mindset.

For a long time, the charm of this area was its quiet. Many residents moved here to go to the beach and ride their bikes in peace. That sentiment resonates with anyone who remembers when Indian River Blvd. (SR 442) was just a quiet dirt road to the highway. I'm a Millennial and I do.

However, a bedroom community relies on external economies to survive. Residents sleep here, but they spend their energy and dollars elsewhere. There doesn't seem to be enough residents frequent local businesses, nor enough incentive to lure outsiders to chance it. Unlike a lot of places, Edgewater depends on property taxes and other residential taxes to carry the weight. The argument for Deering Park, backed by developers and city planners, is that this model is no longer sustainable. To survive, the region needs its own gravity. It needs its own industrial centers, its own commerce, and its own tax base.

From Fighting the Tide to Steering the Ship

There is a temptation to dig our heels in the ground and demand the landscape remain frozen in the 90's. But the reality of real estate rights and zoning laws suggests that fighting if growth happens is often a losing battle. The more effective battle is how it happens. How we can control it with what we have. Trade offs are a given on both sides.

The focus must shift from opposition to mitigation. If the land must be developed, how do we ensure it is done with the least invasive impact on the things that actually matter?

• Hydrology: The water table is our Achilles' heel. The "Outstanding Florida Water" standards promised by developers are meant to be more than regulatory hurdles. They are, essentially, survival metrics for our existing neighborhoods. We should stop arguing about the buildings and start rigorously auditing the drainage.

• Buffers: If we are losing pine scrub, the conversation must turn to the quality of the conservation buffers. Are they thin cosmetic strips or genuine ecological corridors that allow wildlife to coexist with new density?

• Infrastructure First: We have to accept the traffic is coming. Therefore, the pressure on the City Council should shift to ensuring roads like the Williamson Boulevard extension are operational before the rooftops are finished, not later.

• 

The New Reality

Deering Park is coming. The heavy equipment is already moving the earth. The question for the residents of Edgewater, Oak Hill, and NSB is no longer about stopping the clock. It is about ensuring that the new hour does not wash away the foundation of the old one.

We cannot stop the growth, but we can demand that it respects the ground it is built on.

A Note from TerraCraft At TerraCraft, we work with the land every day. We know that changing the landscape requires respect for drainage, soil health, and native ecosystems. As our city grows, we are committed to watching how these big projects handle the dirt we all call home.